Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio G70, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 35/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 317,084); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (207g vs 230g).
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 207g vs 230g
- Better portability (42/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 317084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 417
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1345
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 56 points higher (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (99/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (89/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 317084 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 417 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1345 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 7.0 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 92.5% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (99/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (89/100 vs 37/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 56 points (91/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.