Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio G70, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 35/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 317,084); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (207g vs 226g).
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 207g vs 226g
- Overall rating 35/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 317084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 417
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1345
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 52 points higher (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (93/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (84/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 317084 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 417 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1345 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 7.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 90.3% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (93/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (84/100 vs 37/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 52 points (87/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.