Tecno Phantom V Fold2 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 73/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5750); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,540,240); the Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably lighter (229g vs 249g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Tecno Phantom V Fold2 better?
- Better portability (52/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1540240
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 5401
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5750 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 229g vs 249g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 13 points higher (86/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1540240 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1967 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5401 | 10095 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2000x2296 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5750 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.0×140.4×6.1 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 249 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 5750 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Tecno Phantom V Fold2 by 50.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (92/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (93/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (52/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.