Tecno Camon 30 Premier vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 69/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,240,821); the Tecno Camon 30 Premier is noticeably lighter (210g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 30 Premier better?
- Lighter: 210g vs 229g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1240821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1256
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 4207
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 30 Premier vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 17 points higher (86/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (92/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 Premier | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1240821 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1256 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4207 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×76.2×7.9 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 30 Premier and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 30 Premier by 59.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (92/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (78/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 30 Premier — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 30 Premier and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 65/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 30 Premier over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.