Redmi Turbo 5 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $250 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 67/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,809,170); the Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 229g).
Redmi Turbo 5
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Lighter: 204g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $889
- Better portability (55/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2809170
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 6403
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 80/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 74/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 19 points higher (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 — 86/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 74/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2809170 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $889 |
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 9.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $639. Redmi Turbo 5 was $639 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (93/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (78/100 vs 74/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Redmi Turbo 5 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 80/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.