Redmi Turbo 5 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $250 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 66/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,112,047); the Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Lighter: 204g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $899
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2112047
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6405
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 74/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 22 points higher (88/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 — 82/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 74/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2112047 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 36.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $649. Redmi Turbo 5 was $649 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (94/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 74/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 by 22 points (88/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.