Redmi Turbo 5 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $250 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 66/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,112,047); the Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 7000 mAh
- Lighter: 204g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $950
- Better portability (55/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2112047
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 74/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 25 points higher (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 74/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 — 82/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 74/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2112047 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 50.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $700. Redmi Turbo 5 was $700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (99/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 74/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 by 25 points (91/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.