Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $300 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 71/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,726,802).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Lighter: 219g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $889
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (45/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2726802
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 8932
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 15 points higher (86/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (45/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2726802 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Redmi Turbo 5 Max by 11.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $589. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $589 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (93/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (45/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.