Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Vivo X Fold6
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $300 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 71/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 6900); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 2,726,802); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 6900 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1900
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 2726802
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 8932
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 45/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 17 points higher (88/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (100/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2726802 | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1280 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | — | |
| Launch price | $300 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Redmi Turbo 5 Max by 21.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1600. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $1600 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (87/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (100/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.