Tecno Pova Curve vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $219 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 58/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Curve
Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 39
Battery 64
Portability 70
Value for money 76
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $950

  • Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 33 points higher (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).

Tecno Pova Curve: The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Pova Curve Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Dimensity 7300 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 877641 4247433
Geekbench Single 1011 3640
Geekbench Multi 2813 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2436 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 189 g 230 g
Launch price $219 $950
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
64
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Pova Curve and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Pova Curve Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
58/100
877641 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +79.3%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Curve by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Pova Curve
$219
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $731. Tecno Pova Curve was $731 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (99/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (96/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (85/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova Curve has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.