Tecno Pova Curve vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $219 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 58/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Curve
Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 39
Battery 64
Portability 70
Value for money 76
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 189g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $799

  • Better portability (70/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 31 points higher (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (70/100 vs 35/100).

Tecno Pova Curve: The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Pova Curve Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Dimensity 7300 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 877641 4602290
Geekbench Single 1011 3640
Geekbench Multi 2813 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2436 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 189 g 227 g
Launch price $219 $799
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
64
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Pova Curve and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Pova Curve Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
58/100
877641 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +80.9%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Curve by 80.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Pova Curve
$219
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Launch price difference: $580. Tecno Pova Curve was $580 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (99/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (78/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (92/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (70/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova Curve has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.