Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $229 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 55/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 785,352); the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Curve 2
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Pova Curve 2 better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6510 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $899
- Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 785352
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 995
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2925
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 33 points higher (88/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve 2 — 64/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (94/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Curve 2 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 785352 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 995 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2925 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2364 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.2×7.4 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $229 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2364
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Curve 2 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 76.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $670. Tecno Pova Curve 2 was $670 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (94/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 33 points (88/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve 2 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.