Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs Vivo X Fold6
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $229 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 56/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6900); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 835,566); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.4mm).
Tecno Pova Curve 2
Vivo X Fold6
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6900 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $1900
- Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 835566
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 995
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2925
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 64/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 32 points higher (88/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve 2 — 70/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (87/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (100/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova Curve 2 | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 835566 | 3485039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 995 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2925 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2364 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.2×7.4 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | — | |
| Launch price | $229 | $1900 |
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2364
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Tecno Pova Curve 2 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 76.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1671. Tecno Pova Curve 2 was $1671 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (87/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (82/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (100/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 32 points (88/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve 2 over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.