Tecno Camon Slim vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Tecno Camon Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 52/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Tecno Camon Slim is thinner (6.4mm vs 8.2mm).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon Slim
Performance 39
Display 93
Camera 37
Battery 58
Portability 100
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Tecno Camon Slim better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2100
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon Slim vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 39 points higher (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (100/100 vs 39/100).

Tecno Camon Slim: The Tecno Camon Slim is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Camon Slim Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 4247433
Geekbench Single 750 3640
Geekbench Multi 2100 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1224x2720 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5600 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 60W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16.2 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.8×77.7×6.4 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon Slim
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Camon Slim
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon Slim
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon Slim
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (99/100 vs 39/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (96/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (85/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (100/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon Slim over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.