Tecno Camon Slim vs Vivo iQOO 16

The Tecno Camon Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 53/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5600); the Tecno Camon Slim is thinner (6.4mm vs 8.3mm).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim by 36 points (89/100 vs 53/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Camon Slim

Performance 39
Display 93
Camera 40
Battery 58
Portability 100
Value for money —

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Tecno Camon Slim better?


  • Better portability (100/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2100
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon Slim vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 36 points higher (89/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (100/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (100/100 vs 42/100).

Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Camon Slim Vivo iQOO 16
Processor MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu — 5498720
Geekbench Single 750 4327
Geekbench Multi 2100 12873
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2720 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 5600 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 60W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 17
Brightness (peak) — 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 162.8×77.7×6.4 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight — 223 g
Launch price — $840

Camera comparison

Tecno Camon Slim

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
40
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Camon Slim

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Camon Slim

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Camon Slim

Price unknown

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (100/100 vs 39/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (78/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (90/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (100/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim by 36 points (89/100 vs 53/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon Slim and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Tecno Camon Slim has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 39/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon Slim over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.