Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $249 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 63/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 971,081); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 178g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $899
- Better portability (74/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 971081
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 25 points higher (88/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 76/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 971081 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 70.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $650. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $650 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 25 points (88/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.