Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $249 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 63/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 230g).
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 178g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $950
- Better portability (74/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 28 points higher (91/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 80/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1030590 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $950 |
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 75.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $701. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $701 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (85/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 28 points (91/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.