Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $249 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 63/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6150); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 207g).
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Vivo iQOO 13
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6150 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 207g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $650
- Better portability (74/100 vs 55/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 21 points higher (84/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 80/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (73/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (74/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1030590 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $249 | $650 |
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 67.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $401. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $401 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (73/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (74/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 21 points (84/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.