Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $249 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 63/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6150); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 971,081); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 21 points (84/100 vs 63/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

Performance 58
Display 82
Camera 61
Battery 58
Portability 74
Value for money 76

Vivo iQOO 13

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 82

What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?

  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6150 mAh
  • Lighter: 178g vs 207g
  • Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $650

  • Better portability (74/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 971081
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 21 points higher (84/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 76/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (73/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (74/100 vs 55/100).

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra: The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Camon 50 Ultra Vivo iQOO 13
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 971081 3150555
Geekbench Single 1061 3013
Geekbench Multi 3185 9287
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1208x2644 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 178 g 207 g
Launch price $249 $650

Camera comparison

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Vivo iQOO 13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
63/100
971081 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +69.2%
3150555 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 69.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

$249

Vivo iQOO 13

$650

Launch price difference: $401. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $401 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (73/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (74/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 21 points (84/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.