Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $450 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 73/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,724,757).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Lighter: 193g vs 207g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $650
- Better camera (81/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 70W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 11 points higher (84/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 13 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (73/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1724757 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 45.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (91/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 13 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (73/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.