Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $320 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 65/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6150); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,059,715).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6150 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $320 vs $650
- Better portability (64/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1059715
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 92/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 19 points higher (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 66/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (73/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1059715 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $320 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Tecno Camon 50 Pro by 66.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $330. Tecno Camon 50 Pro was $330 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (91/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (73/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.