Tecno Camon 50 Slim vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $220 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 53/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is noticeably lighter (175g vs 230g).
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 175g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $950
- Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 39/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Slim vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 38 points higher (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Slim — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Slim | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $220 | $950 |
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Launch price difference: $730. Tecno Camon 50 Slim was $730 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (99/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (85/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim by 38 points (91/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Slim over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.