Tecno Camon 50 Slim vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $220 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 53/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5600); the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is noticeably lighter (175g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Slim better?
- Lighter: 175g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $799
- Better portability (84/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 60W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Slim vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 36 points higher (89/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Slim — 62/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (84/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Slim | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $220 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $579. Tecno Camon 50 Slim was $579 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (99/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (78/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (92/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (84/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim by 36 points (89/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Slim and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Slim over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.