Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 34/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 330,006); the ZTE Blade A75 4G is noticeably lighter (189g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1335
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 44/100)
- Lighter: 189g vs 309g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 35 points higher (69/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (91/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (70/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 1335 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 786.8% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Blade A75 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (91/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (70/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (63/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G by 35 points (69/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for everyday use.