Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 65/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,805,187); the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo is noticeably lighter (194g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1805187
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5179
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 194g vs 309g
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 4 points higher (69/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100. In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (63/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1805187 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 5179 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.7×76.0×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo by 62.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo (52/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (63/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo is a better fit for active users.