Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $2899 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 69/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,786,169); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is noticeably lighter (212g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2786169
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2729
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8430
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 88/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 212g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (50/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 2 points higher (71/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ are nearly equal (90/100 vs 88/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 8430 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ by 5.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2619. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ was $2619 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ are nearly equal (90/100 vs 88/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (52/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.