Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $999 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 70/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 2,786,169); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is noticeably lighter (190g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26+
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 2786169
- Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 2729
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 8430
- Lighter: 190g vs 212g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 88/100)
- Better camera (40/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4900 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $999
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 1 points higher (71/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (73/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (72/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 3161126 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2900 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9200 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4900 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26+ and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ by 13.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $719. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ was $719 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (73/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (72/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on camera score (40/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26+ over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.