Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Pova 4
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Pova 4 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 40/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 4 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 554,590); the Tecno Pova 4 is thinner (8.7mm vs 12.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Pova 4
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 554590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 4 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Better portability (40/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Pova 4, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 29 points higher (69/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 4 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (40/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Pova 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 554590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2047 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 12, HIOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 170.6×77.5×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | — | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pova 4
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 4
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Pova 4
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Pova 4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Pova 4 by 427.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Pova 4
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (90/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (70/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 4 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (40/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 4?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 4 by 29 points (69/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Pova 4?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Tecno Pova 4 — 40/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 4?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Pova 4?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Pova 4?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.