Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 vs Vivo X300s
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1799 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 48/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,119,714); the Vivo X300s is noticeably lighter (217g vs 271g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
Vivo X300s
- Overall rating 48/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1119714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1488
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3373
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 10W
- Lighter: 217g vs 271g
- Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $1799
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 63/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 41 points higher (89/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 38/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 0/100, Vivo X300s — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (83/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (42/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1119714 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1488 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3373 | 9553 | |
| Display | 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2208x1768 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 10W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Weight | 271 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $723 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2208x1768
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 10W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 69.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1076. Vivo X300s was $1076 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 63/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (94/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (83/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (42/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 41 points (89/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 63/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 over the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.