Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1799 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 48/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo iQOO 15T is noticeably lighter (216g vs 271g).

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 34 points (82/100 vs 48/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

Performance 64
Display 78
Camera 20
Battery 38
Portability 20
Value for money 4

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 better?


  • Overall rating 48/100

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 1135878
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 216g vs 271g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (65/100 vs 20/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (44/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 34 points higher (82/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 38/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 4/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (97/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (65/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (75/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (44/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1135878 4704310
Geekbench Single 1500 3293
Geekbench Multi 3537 10243
Display 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2208x1768 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 10W 0W
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 16
NFC — yes
Protection — IP68
Weight 271 g 216 g
Launch price $1799 $499

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
20
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2208x1768
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 10W
38
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
48/100
1135878 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +75.9%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 75.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

$1799

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $1300. Vivo iQOO 15T was $1300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (97/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (99/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (65/100 vs 20/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (75/100 vs 38/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (44/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 34 points (82/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 20/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.