Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 48/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 271g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 43 points (91/100 vs 48/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

Performance 64
Display 78
Camera 20
Battery 38
Portability 20
Value for money 4

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 better?


  • Overall rating 48/100

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1135878
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 10W
  • Lighter: 230g vs 271g
  • Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 20/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 43 points higher (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 38/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 4/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (85/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (39/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1135878 4247433
Geekbench Single 1500 3639
Geekbench Multi 3537 11047
Display 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2208x1768 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 10W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 200 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 16
NFC — yes
Protection — IP69
Dimensions — 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 271 g 230 g
Launch price $1799 $950

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
20
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2208x1768
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 10W
38
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
48/100
1135878 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +73.3%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 73.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3

$1799

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $849. Vivo X300 Ultra was $849 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (99/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (96/100 vs 20/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (85/100 vs 38/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (39/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 43 points (91/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 20/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.