Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (2025) runs on the Exynos 2400, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 60/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,042,044); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 27 points (87/100 vs 60/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Performance 79
Display 82
Camera 35
Battery 31
Portability 78
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better?
  • Lighter: 187g vs 226g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2042044
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2085
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6507
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 27 points higher (87/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Exynos 2400 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2042044 3269794
Geekbench Single 2085 3228
Geekbench Multi 6507 9553
Display 6.7" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2640 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 187 g 226 g
Launch price $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
  • 6.7" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE Exynos 2400
60/100
2042044 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +37.5%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 37.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (96/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (81/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 27 points (87/100 vs 60/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 79/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.