Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs Vivo X300s
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $849 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 60/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,841,283); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Vivo X300s
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better?
- Lighter: 187g vs 217g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1841283
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2115
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6826
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $849
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 29 points higher (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE — 34/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (94/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (83/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1841283 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2115 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6826 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 187 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $849 | $723 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 50.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $126. Vivo X300s was $126 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (95/100 vs 79/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (94/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (83/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 79/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE over the Vivo X300s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.