Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $849 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 60/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,841,283); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better?
- Lighter: 187g vs 207g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1841283
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2115
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6826
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $849
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 79/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 24 points higher (84/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE — 34/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (73/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (78/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1841283 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2115 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6826 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $849 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 41.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $199. Vivo iQOO 13 was $199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (99/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (78/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (73/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (78/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 24 points (84/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 79/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.