Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 46/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4350); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 961,191); the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 10.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro better?
- Overall rating 46/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 961191
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3390
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4350 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 226g vs 240g
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 42 points higher (88/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (43/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 961191 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4350 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×79.9×10.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 240 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- 4350 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 71.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (94/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (84/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (81/100 vs 30/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (43/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 42 points (88/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.