Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 46/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4350); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 961,191); the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 10.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro better?
- Overall rating 46/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 961191
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3390
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4350 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 230g vs 240g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 45 points higher (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (85/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (39/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 961191 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4350 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×79.9×10.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 240 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- 4350 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 77.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (85/100 vs 30/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (39/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 45 points (91/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.