Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 46/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4350); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 961,191); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 240g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 38 points (84/100 vs 46/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Performance 59
Display 66
Camera 34
Battery 30
Portability 20
Value for money
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro better?

  • Overall rating 46/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 961191
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3315
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4350 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 207g vs 240g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 59/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 38 points higher (84/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (92/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (73/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (55/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro: The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 961191 3119308
Geekbench Single 1162 3041
Geekbench Multi 3315 9494
Display 6.6" PLS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2408 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4350 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 15W 120W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 168.6×79.9×10.2 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 240 g 207 g
Launch price $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
  • 6.6" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
  • 4350 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
30
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
46/100
961191 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +69.2%
3119308 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 69.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Price unknown
Vivo iQOO 13
$650
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (92/100 vs 59/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (99/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (78/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (73/100 vs 30/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (55/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 38 points (84/100 vs 46/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 59/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.