Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 46/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4350); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 961,191); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 240g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro better?
- Overall rating 46/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 961191
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3390
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4350 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 240g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 38 points higher (84/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (73/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (55/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 961191 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4350 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×79.9×10.2 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 240 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- 4350 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 69.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (91/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (99/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (78/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (73/100 vs 30/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro (55/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro by 38 points (84/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.