Samsung Galaxy S7 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S7 (2016) runs on the Samsung Exynos 8890, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $670 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 27/100 (a 61-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 413,736); the Samsung Galaxy S7 is noticeably lighter (152g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S7
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy S7 better?
- Lighter: 152g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $670 vs $899
- Better portability (84/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 413736
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 413
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1102
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S7 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 61 points higher (88/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S7 — 0/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (84/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S7 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 8890 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 413736 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 413 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1102 | 10243 | |
| Display | 5.1" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 142.4×69.6×7.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 152 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $670 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S7
- Main: 12MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S7
- 5.1" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S7
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S7 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S7 by 87.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $229. Samsung Galaxy S7 was $229 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (94/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (84/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (84/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 by 61 points (88/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S7 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S7 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.