Samsung Galaxy S7 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S7 (2016) runs on the Samsung Exynos 8890, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $670 and $10498. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 27/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 413,736); the Samsung Galaxy S7 is noticeably lighter (152g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy S7
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 152g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $670 vs $10498
- Better portability (84/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 413736
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 413
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1102
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S7 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 64 points higher (91/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (99/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S7 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 8890 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 413736 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 413 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1102 | 11033 | |
| Display | 5.1" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 142.4×69.6×7.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 152 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $670 | $10498 |
Samsung Galaxy S7
- Main: 12MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S7
- 5.1" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S7
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S7 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S7 by 90.3% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $9828. Samsung Galaxy S7 is cheaper by $9828.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (99/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (89/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (85/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 by 64 points (91/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S7 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S7 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.