Samsung Galaxy S7 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy S7 (2016) runs on the Samsung Exynos 8890, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $670 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 27/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 413,736); the Samsung Galaxy S7 is noticeably lighter (152g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S7
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy S7 better?
- Lighter: 152g vs 207g
- Better portability (84/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 413736
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 413
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1102
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $670
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S7 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 57 points higher (84/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S7 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (91/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (73/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (84/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S7 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 8890 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 413736 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 413 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1102 | 9287 | |
| Display | 5.1" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 142.4×69.6×7.9 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 152 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $670 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S7
- Main: 12MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S7
- 5.1" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S7
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S7 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy S7 by 86.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $20. Vivo iQOO 13 was $20 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (91/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (99/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (78/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 (73/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S7 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (84/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S7 by 57 points (84/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S7 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S7 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S7 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.