Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1299 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 74/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,173,453); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 144).
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
- Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2173453
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2250
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 7200
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 226g vs 232g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1299
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 13 points higher (87/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — 56/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2173453 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2250 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7200 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 144 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×79.0×8.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- 6.8" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra by 33.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $400. Vivo X300 Pro was $400 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (96/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.