Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1299 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 74/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,201,149); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 144).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra better?
- Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2201149
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2250
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 7200
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 226g vs 232g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1299
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 14 points higher (88/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — 58/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2201149 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2250 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7200 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 144 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×79.0×8.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- 6.8" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3088x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra by 33.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $400. Vivo X300 Pro was $400 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (96/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.