Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $649 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 67/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 1,857,077); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.0mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 21 points (88/100 vs 67/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Performance 76
Display 79
Camera 67
Battery 46
Portability 51
Value for money 46
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 FE better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 67/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 1857077
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 5500
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 21 points higher (88/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 46/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (82/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (100/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Vivo X Fold6
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400e MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1857077 3485039
Geekbench Single 1850 3228
Geekbench Multi 5500 9553
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 133
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 213 g
Launch price $649 $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e
67/100
1857077 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +46.7%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 46.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
$649
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Launch price difference: $1251. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE was $1251 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (94/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (87/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (82/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (100/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 21 points (88/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.