Samsung Galaxy M17 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $130 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 26/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 607,137); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy M17
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 192g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $130 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1963
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 28/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 31 points higher (57/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (49/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $130 | $2899 |
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M17 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2769. Samsung Galaxy M17 is cheaper by $2769.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (49/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (52/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 31 points (57/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 28/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.