Samsung Galaxy M17 vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $130 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads — 70/100 vs 48/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 607,489).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M17
Samsung Galaxy S26+
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $999
- Overall rating 48/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 960
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 1826
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 190g vs 192g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (40/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ scores 22 points higher (70/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (91/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M17 — 76/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (72/100 vs 69/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17 | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 607489 | 3161126 | |
| Geekbench Single | 960 | 2900 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1826 | 9200 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $130 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M17 and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 80.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $869. Samsung Galaxy M17 was $869 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (91/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (89/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (72/100 vs 69/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 22 points (70/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on camera score (40/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on performance (91/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.