Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $320 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 21/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 192,269); the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is noticeably lighter (181g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 181g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $320 vs $950
- Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 192269
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 172
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 492
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 11/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 17/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 70 points higher (91/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 17/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (99/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (96/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (85/100 vs 17/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7870 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 192269 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 172 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 492 | 11033 | |
| Display | 5.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 152.5×74.8×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 181 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $320 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
- 5.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
- 3600 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 by 95.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $630. Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 was $630 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (99/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (89/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (96/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (85/100 vs 17/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 by 70 points (91/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.