Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 vs Vivo X Fold6
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $320 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 21/100 (a 67-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 192,269); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $320 vs $1900
- Overall rating 21/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 192269
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 172
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 492
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 11/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 17/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 51/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 67 points higher (88/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 17/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 — 0/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (95/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (87/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (82/100 vs 17/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (100/100 vs 70/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7870 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 192269 | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 172 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 492 | 10243 | |
| Display | 5.5" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3600 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB | 512GB | |
| OS | — | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 152.5×74.8×8.0 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 181 g | — | |
| Launch price | $320 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
- 5.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
- 3600 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 by 94.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1580. Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 was $1580 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (95/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (81/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (87/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (82/100 vs 17/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (100/100 vs 70/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 by 67 points (88/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.