Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7880, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $380 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 18/100 (a 68-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is noticeably lighter (157g vs 229g).
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Lighter: 157g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $380 vs $889
- Better portability (84/100 vs 34/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 175
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 760
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 1/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 14/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 68 points higher (86/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 — 0/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (92/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (93/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (78/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (84/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7880 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 175 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 760 | 10095 | |
| Display | 5.2" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 146.1×71.4×7.9 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 157 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $380 | $889 |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
- 5.2" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Launch price difference: $509. Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 was $509 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (92/100 vs 1/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (89/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (93/100 vs 14/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (78/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (84/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 by 68 points (86/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 14/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 1/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.