Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11

The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7880, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $380 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 64/100 vs 10/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 95,000); the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is noticeably lighter (157g vs 210g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 by 54 points (64/100 vs 10/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 5
Battery 0
Design 100
Value for money 84
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Performance 70
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 77
Design 37
Value for money 82
What makes Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 better?
  • Lighter: 157g vs 210g
  • Cheaper: $380 vs $400

  • Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 95000
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 175
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 760
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (70/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (31/100 vs 5/100)
  • Longer battery life (77/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 54 points higher (64/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (70/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (31/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (70/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (31/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (100/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017: The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Processor Samsung Exynos 7880 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 95000 3154662
Geekbench Single 175 3050
Geekbench Multi 760 9300
Display 5.2" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 120W
Main camera 16 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 146.1×71.4×7.9 mm
Weight 157 g 210 g
Price $380 $400
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
  • Main: 16MP
  • Front: 16MP
5
camera
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
  • 5.2" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
  • 3000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
77
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880
10/100
95000 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
64/100 +97.0%
3154662 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 by 97.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
$380
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
$400

Price difference: $20. Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is cheaper by $20.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (70/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (31/100 vs 5/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (77/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (100/100 vs 37/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 by 54 points (64/100 vs 10/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 5/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (70/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.