Samsung Galaxy S8+ vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S8+ (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 8895, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $840 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 28/100 (a 61-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 435,852); the Samsung Galaxy S8+ is noticeably lighter (173g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ by 61 points (89/100 vs 28/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S8+

Performance 32
Display 51
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 74
Value for money 0

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S8+ better?

  • Lighter: 173g vs 227g

  • Better portability (74/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 435852
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 419
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1445
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 3500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $840

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S8+ vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 61 points higher (89/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S8+ — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (99/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (92/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S8+ significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (74/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S8+ Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 8895 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 435852 4602290
Geekbench Single 419 3639
Geekbench Multi 1445 11047
Display 6.2" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution — 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3500 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging — 120W
Wireless charging — 50W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS — Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 159.5×73.4×8.1 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 173 g 227 g
Launch price $840 $799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S8+

  • Main: 12MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S8+

  • 6.2" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S8+

  • 3500 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
15
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S8+ and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S8+ Samsung Exynos 8895
28/100
435852 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +90.5%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S8+ by 90.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S8+

$840

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $41. Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra was $41 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (99/100 vs 32/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (99/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (78/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ (92/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S8+ significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (74/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S8+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S8+ by 61 points (89/100 vs 28/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S8+ and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S8+ has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S8+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S8+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 32/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S8+ over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.