Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $2899 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 64/100 vs 57/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 2,926,532); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is noticeably lighter (210g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (49/100 vs 31/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 210g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $400 vs $2899
- Higher performance (70/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 7 points higher (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (77/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (82/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (49/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (82/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3154662 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 9300 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | 210 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $400 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 7.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2499. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is cheaper by $2499.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (49/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (77/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (37/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (82/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.