Nokia C110 vs Vivo X200 Ultra

The Nokia C110 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 16/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 156,818); the Vivo X200 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C110 doesn't; the Nokia C110 is noticeably lighter (172g vs 229g).

The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 by 70 points (86/100 vs 16/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C110
Performance 8
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 12
Portability 71
Value for money
Vivo X200 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 84
What makes Nokia C110 better?
  • Lighter: 172g vs 229g

  • Better portability (71/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 156818
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 723
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 5W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 8/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C110 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 70 points higher (86/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (92/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C110 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (71/100 vs 34/100).

Nokia C110: The Nokia C110 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C110 Vivo X200 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 156818 3092340
Geekbench Single 233 3100
Geekbench Multi 723 10095
Display 6.3" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1560 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 5W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 167
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 5 MP 50 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 15 / OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 400 nits 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 160.8×74.0×8.5 mm 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 172 g 229 g
Launch price $889
Camera comparison
Nokia C110
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C110
  • 6.3" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1560
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C110
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C110 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C110 MediaTek Helio P22
16/100
156818 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +94.9%
3092340 AnTuTu

Vivo X200 Ultra leads Nokia C110 by 94.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C110
Price unknown
Vivo X200 Ultra
$889
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (92/100 vs 8/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (89/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (93/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (78/100 vs 12/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia C110 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (71/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C110 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 by 70 points (86/100 vs 16/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C110 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Nokia C110 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C110 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C110 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 8/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C110 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Nokia C110 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.